Justice Unshackled

Changing the Narrative: Media’s Role in Perpetuating Stereotypes

By: Marc Andrew Tager

2025 November 26th

1. Introduction: The Architecture of Perception

The American criminal justice system operates not merely through laws, courts, and prisons, but through a pervasive cultural narrative that shapes public consciousness. Throughout the Justice Unshackled series, the structural mechanics of mass incarceration have been laid bare: from the criminalization of youth discussed in Episode 2 1, to the systemic erasure of LGBTQI+ identities in Episode 3 1, the compounded neglect of incarcerated women in Episode 5 1, and the foundational intersections of race and poverty explored in Episode 4.1 Most recently, Episode 8 deconstructed the economic incentives that fuel this machinery. Yet, an essential question remains: How is consent for such a vast and punitive system manufactured among the American public?

The answer lies in the stories society tells itself about crime, safety, and justice. Media representation—spanning news broadcasts, fictional dramas, true crime podcasts, and social media algorithms—functions as the primary interface through which the public engages with the legal system. This interface, however, is rarely a transparent window; it is a distorting mirror. Research consistently demonstrates a profound dissonance between the reality of crime and the public’s perception of it. While violent crime rates have plummeted significantly since their peaks in the 1990s, public anxiety regarding crime has frequently trended upward, a phenomenon fueled by a media ecosystem that monetizes fear and sensationalism.2

This report, serving as the ninth installment of the series, investigates the role of media in perpetuating the stereotypes that sustain mass incarceration. It posits that the media does not simply reflect the biases of the justice system but actively constructs the “criminal” archetype in the American imagination. By analyzing the psychological mechanisms of “Mean World Syndrome,” the racialized framing of news, the “copaganda” of police procedurals, and the specific media-driven panics of the 2024-2025 political landscape, this analysis exposes how narrative choices drive punitive policy. Furthermore, it explores how changing these narratives is not merely an exercise in semantics, but a prerequisite for dismantling the systemic injustices documented throughout this series.

2. Theoretical Frameworks: The Cultivation of Anxiety

To understand the public’s persistent demand for punitive policies despite falling crime rates, one must examine the psychological impact of media consumption. The disconnect between statistical safety and perceived danger is not accidental; it is a predictable outcome of long-term exposure to specific media patterns.

2.1 Mean World Syndrome and Cultivation Theory

In the 1970s, communications professor George Gerbner introduced Cultivation Theory, which suggests that television serves as a centralized storytelling system that shapes viewers’ conceptions of reality. A core component of this theory is “Mean World Syndrome,” a cognitive bias where heavy consumers of mass media perceive the world as more dangerous, violent, and mistrustful than it actually is.4 Gerbner’s research notably shifted the discourse from whether media violence triggers aggression to whether it triggers fear. He found that while violent media might not turn viewers into criminals, it successfully turns them into victims-in-waiting, living in a state of heightened anxiety and dependence on authority for protection.5

This cultivated fear has direct political consequences. Populations suffering from Mean World Syndrome are more likely to support aggressive policing, harsher sentencing, and the erosion of civil liberties in exchange for perceived safety.5 The data supports this durability of fear: Gallup polls conducted annually since 1993 reveal that in 20 out of 24 years, at least 60% of Americans believed crime was rising nationally, even during periods of historic decline.2 In 2023, this figure reached 77%, illustrating that public perception is tethered more to media narratives than to FBI crime statistics.3

2.2 The Mechanics of “Mainstreaming” and “Resonance”

Gerbner identified two processes through which this distortion solidifies: “mainstreaming” and “resonance.” Mainstreaming occurs when heavy viewers from diverse backgrounds converge on a shared, media-derived view of the world—in this case, a world teeming with violent predators.5 Resonance occurs when media images align with a viewer’s lived experience, amplifying the effect. For individuals in high-crime communities, televised violence reinforces their reality; for those in low-crime communities, it acts as a surrogate reality, convincing them that danger is encroaching upon their suburbs.5

This psychological conditioning creates a fertile ground for the “tough on crime” policies discussed in previous episodes. When the electorate perceives a “mean world,” they demand a “tough” response. This dynamic helps explain the resilience of the prison-industrial complex; as long as the media maintains a high baseline of fear, the political capital for decarceration remains scarce.

2.3 The “CSI Effect” and Juror Expectations

Beyond generalized anxiety, media representations distort specific expectations of the legal process. The “CSI Effect,” named after the popular franchise CSI: Crime Scene Investigation, refers to the phenomenon where fictional portrayals of forensic science influence juror behavior.7 In these dramas, forensic evidence is portrayed as instantaneous, unequivocal, and available in every case.

Real-world impact studies suggest that this creates unrealistic burdens on prosecutors and defense attorneys alike. Jurors conditioned by procedural dramas often expect DNA evidence, fingerprint matches, and high-tech ballistics even in routine cases where such evidence is irrelevant or nonexistent.8

Juror ExpectationPercentage of Jurors Expecting EvidenceReality of Forensic Availability
Scientific Evidence (Any)46%Variable; often circumstantial
DNA Evidence22%Rare in non-violent/property crimes
Fingerprint Evidence36%Frequently unavailable/smudged
Ballistics Evidence32%Only relevant in gun crimes

Table 1: Juror Expectations vs. Reality (Source: National Institute of Justice 9)

While some prosecutors argue this makes convictions harder to secure (a “pro-defense” bias), other researchers point to a “pro-prosecution” effect: jurors may overvalue forensic testimony when it is presented, treating it as infallible “science” rather than interpretative analysis subject to error.7 This blind faith in the system’s technological competence obscures the messy reality of plea bargaining, underfunded labs, and wrongful convictions, reinforcing the myth that the justice system is a precise instrument of truth rather than a flawed human institution.

3. Scripted Injustice: The Role of “Copaganda”

If news media provides the raw material for fear, entertainment media provides the narrative structure for authority. The genre of police procedurals—both scripted dramas like Law & Order and reality shows like Cops—functions as a powerful public relations vehicle for law enforcement, a phenomenon critics label “copaganda.” These shows normalize the violation of rights and glorify a version of policing that is often at odds with constitutional protections.

3.1 Distorting the Legal Process

Scripted crime dramas are among the most watched programs in the world, significantly influencing the public’s understanding of the criminal legal system. A landmark study by Color of Change, titled “Normalizing Injustice,” analyzed 26 popular crime series and found that they consistently misrepresent the realities of policing and justice.10 These shows frequently depict police officers violating civil rights—conducting illegal searches, coercing confessions, or using excessive force—not as misconduct, but as necessary heroism required to catch “bad guys”.12

The “rogue cop” archetype, who breaks the rules to achieve justice, teaches viewers that constitutional restraints are technicalities that protect criminals rather than essential liberties that protect citizens.12 Furthermore, these shows render systemic racism invisible. While the real-world justice system is plagued by racial disparities—as detailed in Episode 4 regarding the War on Drugs 1—fictional narratives often present a post-racial fantasy where bias is limited to a few “bad apples” who are swiftly punished by their superiors.12

3.2 Diversity in the Writers’ Room

The distortion in scripted crime dramas is inextricably linked to who tells the stories. The “Normalizing Injustice” report revealed a staggering lack of diversity among the creative teams behind these shows. In the 2017-2018 season, 81% of showrunners were white men.10

TV Series% White Writers% Male Writers
NCIS (CBS)100%80%
Blue Bloods (CBS)100%75%
The Blacklist (NBC)93%80%
Law & Order: SVU (NBC)93-100%57%
Chicago P.D. (NBC)80-90%60%

Table 2: Diversity in Writers’ Rooms of Popular Crime Dramas (Source: Color of Change 10)

This lack of lived experience with the criminal justice system among writers results in storylines that prioritize the perspective of law enforcement while marginalizing defendants, victims, and communities of color.12 The narrative consistently frames the police as the sole protagonists of public safety, ignoring community-led interventions or the collateral consequences of incarceration discussed in Episode 8.1

3.3 Reality Policing: From Cops to On Patrol: Live

The reality television genre has historically been even more aggressive in its promotion of police narratives. Shows like Cops and Live PD built their business models on the commodification of poverty and mental illness, broadcasting the worst moments of people’s lives for entertainment.13 These programs rely on “access journalism,” where producers grant police departments editorial control over footage in exchange for access to ride-alongs.15 This arrangement ensures that instances of police misconduct or brutality are rarely aired, presenting a curated, sanitized version of policing.

Following the murder of George Floyd in 2020, Cops and Live PD were canceled amid a national reckoning on police violence.13 However, the hiatus was brief. Live PD was rebranded as On Patrol: Live and returned to the airwaves in 2022 on the Reelz network.16 Critics argue that the revived format continues to function as “copaganda,” creating a feedback loop where officers perform for the camera, potentially escalating encounters to provide “good TV”.13 The survival of these shows highlights the profitability of the genre and the deep-seated public appetite for narratives that reinforce the authority of the state over the bodies of the marginalized.

4. Racializing Crime: News Media and the Construction of the “Thug”

While entertainment media glorifies the police, news media often demonizes the accused, particularly Black and Brown men. This racialization of crime reporting is not merely a reflection of arrest rates but a disproportionate and systemic bias in how crime is covered, visualized, and described.

4.1 Visual Bias: The Mugshot vs. The Yearbook Photo

The selection of imagery in crime reporting acts as a powerful subconscious signal of guilt or innocence. Research indicates that media outlets are far more likely to use police mugshots when covering Black suspects, while utilizing humanizing images—such as school photos or family pictures—for white suspects accused of similar crimes.17

A study by Color of Change involving major news networks found that newsrooms disproportionately over-represent Black suspects in crime coverage relative to actual arrest statistics. For instance, in New York City, while Black people represented 51% of arrests for violent crime, they made up 75% of the perpetrators shown on news broadcasts.18 Conversely, white crime is systematically under-reported. This visual distortion reinforces the stereotype of Black criminality, creating a “threat narrative” that justifies aggressive policing in Black neighborhoods.18

The mugshot itself is an instrument of the state that strips the subject of context and dignity.20 Recognizing this, some jurisdictions and newsrooms have begun to implement policies banning the publication of mugshots for non-violent offenses to protect the presumption of innocence.21 However, the practice remains a staple of local crime reporting, creating a digital scarlet letter that hinders reentry and employment long after a case is resolved—a barrier to the “second chance” discussed in the series pilot.1

4.2 Missing White Woman Syndrome

The racial bias in crime reporting extends to victims as well. The media phenomenon known as “Missing White Woman Syndrome,” a term popularized by the late journalist Gwen Ifill at a 2004 journalism conference, describes the disproportionate media coverage given to missing person cases involving young, white, upper-middle-class women compared to missing women of color.23

High-profile cases, such as the disappearance of Gabby Petito in 2021 or Laci Peterson in 2002, dominate national news cycles, triggering massive public mobilization and resource allocation.25 In stark contrast, cases involving Black, Indigenous, or Latina women rarely receive sustained national attention. For example, the disappearance of 7-year-old Alexis Patterson, a Black girl from Milwaukee, occurred in the same year as Elizabeth Smart’s kidnapping but received a fraction of the coverage.23

This disparity sends a clear message about whose lives are valued and whose safety is prioritized. It reinforces a hierarchy of victimhood where “innocence” is coded as white and female, while women of color are often framed through lenses of risk, lifestyle, or complicity in their own victimization.23 This erasure aligns with the themes of Episode 5, “The Forgotten Gender,” which highlighted the invisibility of incarcerated women of color within the justice system.1

4.3 Case Study: Hurricane Katrina and the “Looting” Frame

The racial framing of survival was starkly illustrated during the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in 2005. In a now-infamous juxtaposition of news captions, an Associated Press photo showed a Black young man wading through water with the caption “A young man walks through chest deep flood water after looting a grocery store,” while an AFP/Getty photo showed a white couple in nearly identical circumstances with the caption “Two residents wade through chest-deep water after finding bread and soda”.26

This semantic distinction between “looting” and “finding” reveals the implicit bias that codes Black survival as criminal and white survival as resourceful. This framing contributed to the militarized response to the disaster, where the National Guard was deployed with orders to stop “lawlessness” rather than solely to provide humanitarian aid, effectively criminalizing disaster victims based on race.27

5. Historical Panics: Manufacturing the “Superpredator”

Media narratives do not just color public perception; they drive legislative history. The explosion of the U.S. prison population in the 1990s was propelled by a media-manufactured panic that dehumanized an entire generation of Black youth.

5.1 The Birth of the “Superpredator” Myth

In 1995, political scientist John DiIulio Jr. coined the term “superpredator” to predict a coming wave of “hardened, remorseless juveniles” who would unleash chaos upon American cities.29 DiIulio’s theory was explicitly racialized, linking this supposed moral poverty to “Black inner-city neighborhoods”.30 The media amplified this theory with sensationalist fervor, running stories about “wolf packs” and “wilding” teenagers.31

This narrative provided the intellectual and emotional cover for the “tough on crime” legislation of the era, including the 1994 Crime Bill. State legislatures across the country passed laws making it easier to try juveniles as adults, dismantling the rehabilitative focus of the juvenile justice system explored in Episode 2.1 The predicted wave of violence never materialized; in fact, juvenile crime rates dropped by more than half in the subsequent years.30 The “superpredator” was a statistical fiction, but the laws passed in its name resulted in the mass incarceration of thousands of Black and Brown youth, many of whom were sentenced to life without parole.29

5.2 The Legacy of Willie Horton

The modern template for weaponizing crime in political campaigns was established during the 1988 presidential election with the “Willie Horton” advertisement. Produced by supporters of George H.W. Bush, the ad attacked opponent Michael Dukakis for a furlough program that released Horton, a Black man who subsequently committed a violent assault and rape.32

The ad, orchestrated by strategist Lee Atwater, utilized a menacing mugshot of Horton to stoke white racial anxiety, explicitly linking liberal policies to Black criminality.33 The “Willie Horton effect” had a chilling impact on criminal justice reform for decades.35 Fear of being labeled “soft on crime” led Democrats and Republicans alike to abandon furlough programs, support mandatory minimums, and engage in a bidding war of punitiveness.34 The ad demonstrated the raw political power of racialized crime narratives, a lesson that continues to shape campaign strategies in 2024.

6. The True Crime Industrial Complex and Digital Vigilantism

In the 21st century, crime narrative production has shifted from centralized newsrooms to a decentralized “True Crime” industry and digital platforms. With 84% of the U.S. population consuming some form of true crime media, this genre has become a dominant force in shaping public perception.36

6.1 The “Serial” Effect and Public Engagement

The explosion of true crime podcasts, led by Serial in 2014, has transformed listeners into armchair detectives. Research suggests that these podcasts can have tangible impacts on the justice system, sometimes leading to the exoneration of the wrongfully convicted, as seen in the cases of Adnan Syed (Serial) and Curtis Flowers (In the Dark).37 This “democratization of investigation” allows for scrutiny of prosecutorial misconduct and can generate advocacy for cold cases.38

However, the genre also carries significant ethical risks. It often commodifies the trauma of victims and their families, turning tragedy into entertainment.39 Furthermore, the demographic skew of true crime consumers—predominantly women—can reinforce the “Mean World Syndrome,” heightening vigilance and suspicion in ways that may not align with statistical risk.40

6.2 Algorithmic Fear: Citizen and Nextdoor

The rise of neighborhood safety apps like Citizen and Nextdoor has introduced a new form of hyper-local surveillance. These platforms aggregate police scanner data and user reports to create real-time crime feeds. Studies indicate that the use of these apps significantly increases users’ perception of local crime rates, regardless of actual crime data.42

These apps create a feedback loop of suspicion, often facilitating racial profiling where Black and Brown individuals are reported as “suspicious” simply for existing in certain spaces.44 By stripping crime of context and presenting it as a constant stream of threats, these platforms digitize the “if it bleeds, it leads” ethos, turning every smartphone notification into a reinforcement of the need for policing.

7. Modern Media Panics: The 2024-2025 Landscape

As the United States navigates the 2024-2025 political cycle, familiar patterns of media-induced panic have resurfaced, targeting new scapegoats to justify old policies. Two dominant narratives—the “Migrant Crime Wave” and the “Retail Theft Epidemic”—illustrate how media distortion continues to drive legislative rollbacks.

7.1 The Myth of the “Migrant Crime Wave”

In the lead-up to the 2024 election, right-wing media and political campaigns amplified a narrative that the U.S. was experiencing a surge in violent crime driven by undocumented immigrants.46 High-profile anecdotes were leveraged to suggest a systemic crisis, with terms like “migrant crime” becoming central to political messaging.48

However, comprehensive data analysis refutes this narrative. Research from Stanford University, covering 140 years of incarceration data, found that immigrants are significantly less likely to be imprisoned than U.S.-born individuals.49 In 2024, cities receiving the highest numbers of migrants, such as New York, Chicago, and Denver, actually reported declines in overall crime rates.46 Despite this, the narrative has successfully fueled support for harsh border enforcement and mass deportation policies, which, as noted in Episode 8, directly benefit private prison corporations.50

7.2 The “Retail Theft” Panic and Proposition 36

Simultaneously, a media narrative regarding an “epidemic” of organized retail theft has dominated headlines. Viral videos of “smash-and-grab” robberies have created an impression of lawlessness, leading major retailers to lock up basic goods and close stores.51

While specific cities have seen spikes, national data does not support the claim of a widespread surge in retail theft compared to pre-pandemic levels.51 Industry data often conflates external theft with internal “shrinkage” (employee theft and administrative error).51 Nevertheless, this media-driven panic had concrete policy consequences. In California, it drove the passage of Proposition 36 in November 2024, a measure that rolled back the progressive reforms of Proposition 47 by reclassifying certain misdemeanors as felonies and reviving “three-strikes” sentencing for theft.53 This legislative reversal occurred despite data showing that crime rates in California were already falling prior to the proposition’s enactment.55

7.3 Bail Reform and the “Revolving Door” Narrative

Similarly, media coverage of bail reform in states like New York and Illinois has followed a pattern of highlighting individual failures to discredit systemic success. Tabloid outlets frequently run stories linking bail reform to rising crime, despite multiple studies showing no causal link between the elimination of cash bail and increased recidivism.56 This “revolving door” narrative creates political pressure to roll back reforms that reduce the criminalization of poverty, illustrating the media’s power to override data with anecdote.58

8. Economic Incentives: The Profit of Fear

The perpetuation of these narratives is not solely ideological; it is economic. As explored in Episode 8, the prison-industrial complex thrives on the expansion of the carceral state. Media narratives that stoke fear directly serve the financial interests of this sector.

8.1 Private Prison Stocks and Political Rhetoric

The stock prices of major private prison operators, such as GEO Group and CoreCivic, are highly sensitive to political rhetoric regarding crime and immigration. Following the election victories of Donald Trump in 2016 and 2024, shares in these companies surged on the expectation of aggressive detention policies.50 These corporations benefit from the “migrant crime” narrative, as it justifies the government contracts required to detain immigrants and operate prisons.61 The media’s amplification of these threats effectively serves as a marketing campaign for the private detention industry.

8.2 “If It Bleeds, It Leads” and Police Budgets

Local news media operates on a business model that prioritizes violent crime stories to drive viewership—the “if it bleeds, it leads” standard.62 This sensationalism creates a warped public perception of safety, where viewers believe crime is rampant regardless of trends. This manufactured fear translates into political support for increased police budgets.64 Fearful constituents demand “law and order,” making it politically perilous for officials to reduce police funding even when crime is low.

9. The Power of Language: Dehumanization by Definition

Language is the infrastructure of thought. The terms used by media to describe justice-impacted individuals play a crucial role in maintaining the social distance necessary for mass incarceration.

Terms like “inmate,” “felon,” “convict,” and “offender” reduce a human being to their status within the punishment bureaucracy.65 This labeling promotes “civil death,” justifying the stripping of rights such as voting (Episode 7) and employment opportunities (Episode 1).1 Recognizing this, organizations like The Marshall Project have pioneered “The Language Project,” advocating for “person-first” language (e.g., “incarcerated person,” “person with a felony conviction”) to restore dignity and accuracy to crime reporting.66

10. Conclusion: Reclaiming the Story

The American prison system is not a broken machine; it is a designed system of control, fueled by narratives of fear and difference.1 The media has historically served as the architect of these narratives, constructing myths of superpredators, migrant waves, and lawless cities to manufacture consent for punitive policies.

However, the landscape is shifting. The rise of Solutions Journalism—reporting that investigates responses to social problems rather than just the problems themselves—offers a path forward.68 Organizations like the Equal Justice Initiative (EJI) and Color of Change are actively challenging these narratives, producing data and stories that center the humanity of the incarcerated.66

Changing the narrative is not passive; it requires active resistance. It demands diversifying newsrooms to include voices with lived experience of the system.10 It requires the public to critically question the “police blotter” style of reporting and demand context. As the Justice Unshackled series has demonstrated, the laws that lock us up are sustained by the stories we believe. To unshackle justice, we must first unshackle the truth.

References Summary

Works cited

  1. [Justice Unshackled]_[Episode_6]_[Is the Prison System Broken or Designed].pdf
  2. Mean World Syndrome: Public Perception of Crime Doesn’t Match Reality, accessed November 26, 2025, https://interrogatingjustice.org/decriminalizing-mental-illness/mean-world-syndrome/
  3. The Impact of Public Perception of Criminal Activity | UT Permian Basin Online, accessed November 26, 2025, https://online.utpb.edu/about-us/articles/criminal-justice/the-impact-of-public-perception-of-criminal-activity/
  4. Mean world syndrome – Wikipedia, accessed November 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_world_syndrome
  5. Violence in Popular U.S. Prime Time TV Dramas and the Cultivation of Fear – University of Pennsylvania, accessed November 26, 2025, https://repository.upenn.edu/bitstreams/0672d880-b59b-481c-9d38-19abdb4c01f7/download
  6. THE MEAN WORLD SYNDROME: – Media Education Foundation, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.mediaed.org/transcripts/Mean-World-Syndrome-Transcript.pdf
  7. The “CSI Effect” and Its Potential Impact on Juror Decisions – SJSU ScholarWorks, accessed November 26, 2025, https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/themis/vol3/iss1/6/
  8. The ‘CSI’ Effect: The Impact of ‘Television-Educated’ Jurors – Drexel University, accessed November 26, 2025, https://drexel.edu/news/archive/2015/november/csi_effect
  9. The ‘CSI Effect’: Does It Really Exist? | National Institute of Justice, accessed November 26, 2025, https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/csi-effect-does-it-really-exist
  10. Normalizing Injustice: New Landmark Study by Color Of Change Reveals How Crime TV Shows Distort Understanding Of Race and the Criminal Justice System, accessed November 26, 2025, https://colorofchange.org/blog/internal_press/normalizing-injustice-new-landmark-study-by-color-of-change-reveals-how-crime-tv-shows-distort-understanding-of-race-and-the-criminal-justice-system/
  11. Normalizing Injustice as Standard Practice & Cultural Norm – Color of Change Hollywood, accessed November 26, 2025, https://hollywood.colorofchange.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Normalizing-Injustice_Abridged-1.pdf
  12. Normalizing Injustice – Crime TV – Color Of Change Hollywood, accessed November 26, 2025, https://hollywood.colorofchange.org/crime-tv-report/
  13. Reality TV Copaganda is back and worse than ever., accessed November 26, 2025, https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/11/reality-tv-cops-on-patrol-live-pd.html
  14. Good Riddance to Cops and Live PD : r/television – Reddit, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/television/comments/h77kzp/good_riddance_to_cops_and_live_pd/
  15. The revival of Live PD is a potentially dangerous reality TV backslide – The Guardian, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/jun/09/live-pd-tv-police-crime-reality-series
  16. On Patrol: Live – Wikipedia, accessed November 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Patrol:_Live
  17. Report Documents Racial Bias in Coverage of Crime by Media – Equal Justice Initiative, accessed November 26, 2025, https://eji.org/news/report-documents-racial-bias-in-coverage-of-crime-by-media/
  18. Not To Be Trusted: Dangerous Levels of Inaccuracy in TV Crime Reporting in NYC, accessed November 26, 2025, https://colorofchange.org/resources/newsaccuracyratings/
  19. Dangerous Levels of Inaccuracy in TV Crime Reporting in New York City – Color Of Change, accessed November 26, 2025, https://colorofchange.org/blog/internal_press/news-accuracy-ratings/
  20. The Public Sharing Of Mugshots Undermines The Presumption Of Innocence, accessed November 26, 2025, https://bailproject.org/learn/the-public-sharing-of-mugshots-undermines-the-presumption-of-innocence/
  21. Are You Picture Perfect? AB 994 and Posting Mugshots on Law Enforcement Social Media Accounts | Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.bwslaw.com/news/are-you-picture-perfect-ab-994-and-posting-mugshots-on-law-enforcement-social-media-accounts/
  22. Legal Alert OAG-2024-05 Guidance on Sharing of Booking Photographs on Social Media – California Department of Justice, accessed November 26, 2025, https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/media/legal-alert-oag-2024-05.pdf
  23. 3 Minutes on Missing White Woman Syndrome | American Magazine, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.american.edu/magazine/article/3-minutes-on-missing-white-woman-syndrome.cfm
  24. The ‘Missing White Woman Syndrome’ still plagues America | Derecka Purnell | The Guardian, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/sep/29/the-missing-white-woman-syndrome-still-plagues-america
  25. Reckoning with news media’s missing white woman syndrome – Maynard Institute, accessed November 26, 2025, https://mije.org/news/2021/10/01/missing-white-woman-syndrome.html
  26. Race and Media Coverage of Hurricane Katrina: Analysis, Implications, and Future Research Questions, accessed November 26, 2025, https://cretscmhd.psych.ucla.edu/nola/volunteer/EmpiricalStudies/Race%20and%20media%20coverage%20of%20hurricane%20katrina%20-%20analysis,%20implications,%20and%20future%20research%20questions.pdf
  27. The Criminalization of New Orleanians in Katrina’s Wake – Items, accessed November 26, 2025, https://items.ssrc.org/understanding-katrina/the-criminalization-of-new-orleanians-in-katrinas-wake/
  28. The lie of the storm – Columbia Journalism Review, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.cjr.org/special_report/new-orleans-hurrcane-katrina-ida-looting.php
  29. Combating the Myth of the Superpredator – Retro Report, accessed November 26, 2025, https://retroreport.org/video/combating-the-myth-of-the-superpredator/
  30. theoriginsof the superpredator – Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth, accessed November 26, 2025, https://cfsy.org/wp-content/uploads/Superpredator-Origins-CFSY.pdf
  31. Unpacking the Racially-Charged Term “Superpredators” – JSTOR Daily, accessed November 26, 2025, https://daily.jstor.org/unpacking-the-racially-charged-term-superpredators/
  32. Willie Horton incident | Research Starters – EBSCO, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/willie-horton-incident
  33. Willie Horton – Wikipedia, accessed November 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willie_Horton
  34. The Campaign Ad that Reshaped Criminal Justice | The Takeaway – WNYC Studios, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/takeaway/segments/crime-reshaped-criminal-justice
  35. The Complicated Reality of the “Willie Horton” Effect – Prisons, Prosecutors, and the Politics of Punishment, accessed November 26, 2025, https://johnfpfaff.com/2024/05/30/the-complicated-reality-of-the-willie-horton-effect/
  36. The True Crime Consumer Report by Edison Research and audiochuck, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.edisonresearch.com/the-true-crime-consumer-report-by-edison-research-and-audiochuck/
  37. The ‘Serial Effect’ — Unpacking the Phenomenon of the True-Crime Podcast, accessed November 26, 2025, https://news.gsu.edu/research-magazine/the-serial-effect
  38. accessed November 26, 2025, https://nbi-sems.com/blogs/news/storytelling-how-true-crime-podcasts-are-changing-the-media-landscape#:~:text=Impact%20on%20Public%20Perception%20and%20Legal%20Proceedings&text=Such%20coverage%20can%20lead%20to,selection%20and%20the%20judicial%20process.
  39. Research examines the good, bad and ugly of true crime media | Nebraska Today, accessed November 26, 2025, https://news.unl.edu/article/research-examines-the-good-bad-and-ugly-of-true-crime-media
  40. Studying impacts of true crime media – Research Report 2023, accessed November 26, 2025, https://research.unl.edu/annualreport/2023/podcasts/
  41. True crime podcasts are popular in the U.S., particularly among women and those with less formal education – Pew Research Center, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/06/20/true-crime-podcasts-are-popular-in-the-us-particularly-among-women-and-those-with-less-formal-education/
  42. Study Finds Neighborhood Apps Increase Perceptions of Crime Rates – University of Houston, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.uh.edu/news-events/stories/2023/march-2023/03272023-fetterman-neighborhood-app-crime-fears.php
  43. Study: Neighborhood Apps Skew Perceptions of Crime, Danger, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.govtech.com/public-safety/study-neighborhood-apps-skew-perceptions-of-crime-danger
  44. The New Neighborhood Watch: An Exploratory Study of the Nextdoor App and Crime Narratives – ResearchGate, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mary-Dodge/publication/379055823_The_New_Neighborhood_Watch_An_Exploratory_Study_of_the_Nextdoor_App_and_Crime_Narratives/links/661d6209f7d3fc2874633334/The-New-Neighborhood-Watch-An-Exploratory-Study-of-the-Nextdoor-App-and-Crime-Narratives.pdf
  45. Citizen and Nextdoor Are Making Us All Vigilantes. Is That a Good Thing? – Flatland KC, accessed November 26, 2025, https://flatlandkc.org/news-issues/citizen-and-nextdoor-are-making-us-all-vigilantes-is-that-a-good-thing/
  46. Debunking ‘Migrant Crime Wave’ Myth – The Brennan Center, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.endfmrnow.org/debunking-migrant-crime-wave-myth-the-brennan-center
  47. Debunking the Myth of the ‘Migrant Crime Wave’ | Brennan Center for Justice, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/debunking-myth-migrant-crime-wave
  48. The ‘migrant crime’ wave, debunked – Reason Magazine, accessed November 26, 2025, https://reason.com/2024/05/16/the-migrant-crime-wave-debunked/
  49. The mythical tie between immigration and crime | Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), accessed November 26, 2025, https://siepr.stanford.edu/news/mythical-tie-between-immigration-and-crime
  50. What Trump’s Victory Means for the Private Prison Industry | Brennan Center for Justice, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/what-trumps-victory-means-private-prison-industry
  51. Myth vs. Reality: Trends in Retail Theft | Brennan Center for Justice, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/myth-vs-reality-trends-retail-theft
  52. Shoplifting Trends: What You Need to Know – Council on Criminal Justice, accessed November 26, 2025, https://counciloncj.org/shoplifting-trends-what-you-need-to-know/
  53. Understanding Proposition 36 – California Budget & Policy Center, accessed November 26, 2025, https://calbudgetcenter.org/resources/understanding-proposition-36/
  54. Prop 36: A Step Backward for Community Safety and Stability in California | Vera Institute, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.vera.org/explainers/prop-36-californias-ballot-proposition-to-recall-prop-47-explained
  55. Property Crime Reached Record Lows in 2024 — Before Prop 36 Even Took Effect, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.cjcj.org/reports-publications/report/california-crime-rates-were-falling-even-before-prop-36-took-effect
  56. Bail Reform and Public Safety | Brennan Center for Justice, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/bail-reform-and-public-safety
  57. Does New York’s Bail Reform Law Impact Recidivism? A Quasi-Experimental Test in New York City – Data Collaborative for Justice, accessed November 26, 2025, https://datacollaborativeforjustice.org/work/bail-reform/does-new-yorks-bail-reform-law-impact-recidivism-a-quasi-experimental-test-in-new-york-city/
  58. New Yorkers Have Known Bail Doesn’t Work for 60 Years. Why Are We Still Debating It?, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.vera.org/news/new-yorkers-have-known-bail-doesnt-work-for-60-years-why-are-we-still-debating-it
  59. New York Rolled Back Bail Reform. What Will The Rest Of The Country Do?, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.themarshallproject.org/2020/04/23/in-new-york-s-bail-reform-backlash-a-cautionary-tale-for-other-states
  60. Profiting from Punishment: How Private Prisons and Tough-on-Crime Policies Sustain Mass Incarceration – Vanderbilt Political Review, accessed November 26, 2025, https://vanderbiltpoliticalreview.com/12384/us/profiting-from-punishment-how-private-prisons-and-tough-on-crime-policies-sustain-mass-incarceration/
  61. Publicly Traded Private Prisons – The Flaw, accessed November 26, 2025, https://theflaw.org/articles/publicly-traded-private-prisons/
  62. If it Bleeds, it Leads: Coverage of Violent Crime by the U.S. Television News Media – Open edition books, accessed November 26, 2025, https://books.openedition.org/psn/4850?lang=en
  63. Media Coverage of Criminal Justice | Research Starters – EBSCO, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/communication-and-mass-media/media-coverage-criminal-justice
  64. A qualitative analysis of sensationalism in media – The Research Repository @ WVU – West Virginia University, accessed November 26, 2025, https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4222&context=etd
  65. What Words We Use — and Avoid — When Covering People and Incarceration, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.themarshallproject.org/2021/04/12/what-words-we-use-and-avoid-when-covering-people-and-incarceration
  66. The Language Project | The Marshall Project, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.themarshallproject.org/2021/04/12/the-language-project
  67. People First Language Guide | FWD.us, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.fwd.us/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/People-First-Language-Guide.pdf
  68. Case study: “Behind Broken Doors” | by Keith H. Hammonds | The Whole Story, accessed November 26, 2025, https://thewholestory.solutionsjournalism.org/case-study-behind-broken-doors-d42f0dd02ea3
  69. About EJI, accessed November 26, 2025, https://eji.org/about/
  70. Hate Crimes | Facts and Statistics – Department of Justice, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.justice.gov/hatecrimes/hate-crime-statistics
  71. Economics of incarceration – Prison Policy Initiative, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.prisonpolicy.org/research/economics_of_incarceration/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *